Britons will have to wait longer when attempting to access their state pension payments

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed it is "sending letters" to Britons affected by a major state pension change - will you get one?

As it stands, the official retirement age is being raised from 66 to 67 years old, with the Government department promising to notify those impacted.

Letters are initially being dispatched to people born between 6 April and 5 May 1960, who represent the first cohort impacted by the phased change.

The communication strategy, outlined in a DWP document published today, is designed to prevent a repeat of the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) scandal.

Women born in the 1950s were inadequately notified about earlier pension age alterations, leading to widespread criticism.

In its action plan, the department acknowledged past shortcomings, stating: "The Government accepted that maladministration in decision-making between August 2005 and December 2007 resulted in a 28-month delay in beginning to send individual letters to 1950s-born women about the changes in state pension age."

The phased transition began in 2026 and will reach full implementation within two years. Those in the initial group will need to wait an additional month beyond their 66th birthday before receiving their state pension.

Subsequent birth cohorts face incrementally longer delays. Individuals born between May 6 and June 5, 1960 must wait until 66 years and two months, while those born from June 6 to July 5, 1960 reach pension age at 66 years and three months.

The increments continue monthly through the year. People born between September 6 and October 5, 1960 face a six-month extension, reaching pension age at 66 and a half years.

Anyone born from March 6, 1961 onwards will have a state pension age of 67 years. Adam Cole, a retirement specialist at Quilter, has welcomed the DWP's renewed approach to pension communications.

He described the action plan as "a clear acknowledgement that communication around the State Pension has not always landed as it should."

However, Mr Cole cautioned that improved messaging alone may prove insufficient. He noted that many individuals only begin considering their retirement finances later in life, by which point their choices have narrowed considerably.

The retirement expert added: "Encouraging individuals to check their State Pension age and forecast is sensible, but awareness needs to translate into action. The real test of this action plan will be whether it drives that behavioural shift."

He argued for introducing financial education much earlier, giving people greater opportunity to accumulate retirement savings through regular contributions and compound growth.

Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden acknowledged the complexity, noting that "the same age can feel different and be experienced differently by people in different parts of the country".

Critics note that when the pension age previously rose from 65 to 66, an additional 100,000 65-year-olds were pushed into absolute income poverty compared with the period before that change.