She also claimed Heathrow was 'complicit in the killing of Palestinian babies'
A Muslim security officer at Heathrow has lost her discrimination lawsuit against Heathrow Airport after being told to remove a Palestine badge.
Zara Saiyed brought legal action against Heathrow Airport Ltd, alleging that her colleagues and managers had discriminated against her on grounds of race and religion following a dispute over the badge attached to her work lanyard.
The employment tribunal rejected every one of her claims in a unanimous decision, having reviewed close to two weeks of testimony and examined more than 1,600 pages of documentation.
The dispute occurred in November 2023, just weeks after the Hamas-led attacks in October that year which resulted in 1,200 deaths and 251 hostages being taken.
A fellow employee challenged Ms Saiyed about the Palestinian flag badge displayed on her staff lanyard.
The following day, the former Unite Union representative submitted an official grievance, maintaining that the emblem represented a vital expression of her personal identity and beliefs.
She contended that the request to remove it constituted discriminatory treatment.
In her formal complaint, Ms Saiyed wrote: "Demanding the removal of the Palestinian flag from my lanyard is tantamount to finding my hijab offensive and insisting on its removal."
The situation rapidly deteriorated as Ms Saiyed filed additional complaints against the airport.
In a subsequent grievance, she alleged that Heathrow was "complicit in the killing of Palestinian babies", asserting that the airport's handling of her concerns effectively supported Palestinian oppression.
Her complaints multiplied to encompass various aspects of her workplace experience.
These included grievances concerning internal meetings, diversity-related events, and communications with her supervisors.
Ms Saiyed also raised objections about the airport's decision to withhold publication of a Ramadan video featuring her.
The tribunal heard evidence that she pursued numerous formal complaints regarding how management addressed the original dispute and its aftermath.
The tribunal determined that Heathrow had made substantial efforts to address Ms Saiyed's concerns throughout the protracted dispute.
Evidence presented showed that airport management conducted repeated investigations into her various complaints.
Officials met with Ms Saiyed on multiple occasions and attempted to find resolutions to the issues she had raised.
The panel reached its conclusions after examining testimony spanning nearly a fortnight and reviewing an extensive documentary record exceeding 1,600 pages.
Despite the airport's efforts to engage with her grievances, Ms Saiyed continued to pursue her discrimination claims through the legal process.
The tribunal's unanimous verdict found that none of her allegations of racial or religious discrimination were substantiated by the evidence.