I speak through my eyes, yet I see Britain's decline more clearly than most

Thank you for subscribing!

Ideological indoctrination, biased policing and creeping censorship are dragging Britain away from common sense, writes the disability advocate who communicates using a device controlled by her eyes

If my grandparents were alive today, they would be utterly flabbergasted by what has become of this country.

They built Britain on hard work, common sense, and common decency. Yet today, sickening ideologies try to dictate how we act, think, and speak, while our institutions prioritise political correctness over basic duty.

Exhausted by a media landscape that plays down our nation's decline, I have been fortunate to sit in the audience for Patrick Christys Tonight three times this year.

I value GB News for exposing the truth, giving ordinary people a voice, and celebrating patriotism. On each occasion, I proudly used my communication aid to join the debate.

Through this device, which I control with my eyes, I am fully able to express myself. Living with Cerebral Palsy affects all four of my limbs, leaving me unable to walk, speak, or use my hands and arms. To get around, I rely on a powered wheelchair operated entirely by head controls.

But while my body faces these challenges, my mind and voice are completely unchecked.

As a child, I moved from a special needs school to mainstream primary and secondary education after the former failed to meet my academic potential.

I left at sixteen—rejecting the sixth form over policies that contradicted its claims of inclusivity—to become a voluntary NHS Children's Services consultant advising on system improvements.

Spurred on by this, I eventually earned a 2:1 in Health and Social Care.

Typing via eye control technology made coursework exceptionally slow—take one 5,000-word assignment, for example, which took me five gruelling months to complete. Post-graduation, I bring that experience full circle by educating healthcare students across various universities on disability issues through guest talks and Q&As.

My degree taught me one lesson: its content was simply common sense and school-level knowledge wrapped in high-level jargon.

The university marketed this qualification as vital for frontline care and management—roles that rely on compassion, workplace training, and, where needed, relevant qualifications, rather than a generic award.

This logic applies across an entire market of manufactured credentials, from fashion to gender studies.

Worse, these courses are hotbeds for what looks to me like ideological indoctrination—a reality I witnessed firsthand.

Indeed, as I have seen through working with universities, this is even true in necessary degrees, where vital, career-specific knowledge is routinely diluted.

The consequences are stark: Policy Exchange highlights the abysmal financial returns of low-value degrees, while The Telegraph revealed 707,000 graduates relying on benefits.

For many, university is merely a taxpayer-funded delay on adulthood—leaving underemployed graduates to default back into practical roles they could have entered straight from school, now years behind and burdened with debt. With critical shortages in building, plumbing, and care, our degree obsession starves the economy of practical workers while locking young people in useless classrooms.

The mind-training of modern universities has escaped campus to sabotage our most fundamental right: free speech. Step out of line today, and the establishment will shame, mislabel, and criminalise you.

Official police Freedom of Information data proves it: UK forces arrest over 30 people every single day purely for online speech—over 12,000 detentions a year.

Through arrests, cautions, and life-wrecking sentences, the process itself becomes the punishment—staged intimidation engineered to send a chilling signal while word-dictating zealots build a one-view-fits-all haven.

This is driven by censor-worshipping laws like the Online Safety Act—better named the Online Surveillance Act.

It forces Big Tech to deploy AI content filters, while the proposed under-16 social media ban will serve as Digital ID dressed up in drag.

Marketed as child protection, it will force adults to scan their faces or submit state IDs just to access modern networks—building a mass-verification apparatus to control speech.

Ultimately, this dragnet lets a digital Big Brother infiltrate our private lives to crush dissent—a ruthless attempt to exclude the opposition and lock us into a rigid agenda where genuine debate is dying a speedy death.

This ideological shift is not restricted to online monitoring; it has actively infected how laws are enforced on our streets.

Our once much-admired police force has been virtually hypnotised into making race and religion its core focus.

Trainees are taught about "white privilege," forced through exercises on institutional anti-racism, and drilled on political opinions like Brexit driving right-wing extremism. This is brainwashing and scaremongering on a grand scale.

By conditioning officers to fixate on identity, the system leaves them terrified of acting fairly.

The result is two-tier policing: leniency for favoured causes and aggressive targeting for everyone else. Look no further than the tragic case of Henry Nowak, where a dying young man was handcuffed and denied basic dignity because officers blindly swallowed his killer's false claims of racist abuse.

This same double standard plays out in plain sight, where unruly pro-Palestinian marches get a light touch while counter-protests face a heavy hand.

This institutional favouritism leaves ordinary people feeling like second-class citizens exposed to stomach-churning risks.

The police and their puppet-masters must reflect and reprioritise real duty—without delay.

Ultimately, Britain will overcome this sinister period of state-sponsored mind games. We are too intelligent, traditional, and decent a society to let ideological dogma become our permanent reality. The establishment will fail, and common sense will prevail.

Until then, we must hold fast to our heritage and demand logical change.

This will be remembered as nothing more than a passing scar on our nation. Lunacy will not prevail.